Héritage Montréal
Recent articles
  • Mark London's work at the heart ofHéritage Montréal first decade
  • Speech by Phyllis Lambert on the occasion of Héritage Montréal's 50th anniversary
  • Héritage Montréal — 50 years of heritage action.
  • The former site of the Miséricorde Hospital in the news
  • Our position sent to the borough—Redevelopment project for the Institution for the Deaf and Dumb
Archives
  • February 2026
  • December 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • May 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • February 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • May 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • April 1986
  • June 1983
Héritage Montréal Héritage Montréal
  • Main website
  • About
  • Activities
  • Memento Platform
  • Support the foundation
  • FR
  • Positions

Open letter | OCPM: Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater

  • Héritage Montréal
  • November 18, 2023
  • One comment
  • 3 minutes to read

The Office de consultation publique de Montréal (OCPM) has been in the spotlight for several days now. In the midst of this storm, we feel it is important to distinguish certain questionable management practices of the organization itself from its important role in Montreal democracy. 

It's perfectly legitimate to take offence at the practices of OCPM executives and to demand that they set an example in the interests of sound management of public finances. However, to question the relevance of the institution and the very function of public consultation is a step we find unacceptable.

Since its creation, the OCPM has played an important and unique role in informing and educating Montreal's civil society by providing access to studies that enable them to express their opinions on the plans, policies and major development projects that are shaping the face of the city. The consultations it organizes are invaluable moments for the public and for the organizations taking part. They are an opportunity to ask questions, put forward ideas, comment on proposals and often push the city to demonstrate ambition and exemplarity.

The consultation practices developed at the OCPM have influenced the presence and quality of public participation initiatives carried out by municipal authorities, and over the years have enabled the transition from a culture of confrontation over urban development visions to an admittedly imperfect culture of dialogue and exchange. Of course, there is always room for optimization of processes and tools, as well as monitoring mechanisms, in order to further develop this culture of exchange.

The Office's contribution goes beyond the adoption or non-adoption of recommendations by the administration, although this is an indicator to be considered. The benefits for Montrealers are many and varied, depending on the project or theme addressed. The discussions generated by the consultations encourage reflection both upstream and downstream of the tabling of reports. They encourage civil society to take ownership of issues, and help to inform decision-makers about the population's expectations and aspirations, thereby improving plans, policies and projects.

Over the past few years, we have held a number of landmark consultations. Think of the record participation in the recent Réflexion 2050 consultation on the Projet de Ville, the mobilization ahead of the development of the Parc Jean-Drapeau Master Plan, the intense and constructive debates around the vision of accessibility to Mont-Royal, or the debate on the future of the Pierrefonds-Ouest sector, which laid the foundations for the Grand parc de l'Ouest. Not to mention initiatives such as the consultation on systemic racism and discrimination, around issues that cultivate Montreal's "vivre-ensemble", or the one on fossil fuel reduction, a prelude to a change of course in terms of mobilization in the fight against hydrocarbon dependency.

This is why, in addition to recognizing the importance of this unique body, it is also urgent to enhance its role with administrative and political authorities. The OCPM's work stimulates collective intelligence and represents the voice of civil society. How can we, in a democracy like ours, deprive ourselves of such a contribution?

In short, in the midst of all this turmoil, we feel it's essential to avoid any shortcuts between the disconnected decisions of a few individuals and the relevance of this democratic institution which, for over 20 years, has been constructively framing freedom of expression and participation in collective dialogue.

Signatories :

  • Emmanuel Rondia, General Manager, Conseil régional de l'environnement de Montréal
  • Louise Harel, MNA 1981-2008 and Minister of Municipal Affairs and Metropolis 1998-2002
  • Véronique Fournier, General Manager, Montréal Urban Ecology Centre and former city councillor 2009-2013 
  • François William Croteau, General Manager, IRIU, former Mayor of Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie 2009-2021
  • Ron Rayside, Rayside-Labossière
  • Yves Bellavance, Coordinator, Montreal Coalition of Neighborhood Tables
  • Hélène Panaïoti, Co-General Manager, Les Amis de la montagne
  • Patricia Clermont, Coordinator, Association québécoise des médecins pour l'environnement (AQME)
  • Moridja Kitenge Banza and Emmanuelle Hébert, President and General Manager, Culture Montréal
  • Linda Collette, co-founding member, Les Amis du Quai de l'Horloge
  • Victor Balsis, President, AmiEs du courant Sainte-Marie
  • Florence Paulhiac, Professor, Department of Urban and Tourism Studies, Université du Québec à Montréal
  • Christine Caron, Director, Association des résidants du Vieux-Montréal
  • Dinu Bumbaru, Director of Policy, Héritage Montréal
  • Malorie Flon, General Manager, Institut du Nouveau Monde
  • Christian Savard, General Manager, Vivre en Ville
Illustration de couverture : Image issue de la consultation de l'OCPM sur le Royal Victoria – Crédits : Afiah Anis Syedah
Share
Tweet
Share
Share
Photo avatar
Héritage Montréal

Previous article
  • History and heritage

50 years since the demolition of the Van Horne Mansion: measuring progress and challenges for the city's heritage

  • Dinu Bumbaru
  • September 7, 2023
Read the Article
Next article
  • Positions

Maintaining the OCPM to better develop Montreal

  • Héritage Montréal
  • November 18, 2023
Read the Article
You may also like
Read the Article
  • Positions

Heritage and federal elections 2025: opportunities and obligations not to be forgotten  

  • Héritage Montréal
  • April 25, 2025
Read the Article
  • News
  • Positions

Abandonment of the FACE school, a major decision for our heritage

  • Héritage Montréal
  • April 18, 2025
Read the Article
  • News
  • Positions

New project on the Molson site: A unique opportunity!

  • Héritage Montréal
  • December 13, 2024
1 comment
  1. Marthe Roberge said:
    November 18, 2023 at 9:08 AM

    Thank you for the recommendations and for writing this letter. I fully agree with the comments made in this letter.
    Good energy and thank you for your involvement.

    Reply

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Follow us!
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Héritage Montréal

Enter your search keywords and press Enter.